August 3, 2009
Blade Length versus Effectiveness

In ancient times, just as in modern times, the outcome of battles was often decided by which foe had the superior weaponry. In the Age of Steel, soldiers, knights, and warriors wielded medieval swords made from steel. While the weapons were all made with the same blacksmithing techniques, the length and width of the blades differed greatly. The effectiveness of a blade often depended on the foe it went up against. A long blade, for example, would be suitable for cutting down several enemies with medium length blades. The tradeoff with a long blade was its weight, and the effort required to swing it. If the first swing missed with a long blade, an opponent with a short blade might be able to close the gap to strike before the long blade wielder could swing again. With medieval swords, most blades were about 24-28 inches in length. A short blade would be 12-16 inches, and a long blade would be in excess of 36 inches.

Armies of soldiers clashed wielding these blades, and the outcome of many battles was decided by the technique of warriors and the quality and length of their blades.

Throughout history, war and religion have often been closely linked.  The Ancient Romans and Vikings both believed their Gods compelled them to attack and conquer neighboring peoples, and while the idea of a religiously motivated empire state can seem primitive and outdated, many more modern cultures have had a similar attitude.  America has always been a religious country, and American politicians and religious leaders have often described us as God’s “chosen people.”  They pointed to the vast country they’d been given to inhabit, a “new Eden,” as it was sometimes called, and the abundance of natural resources that lay within its borders. 

In 1845, a newspaper columnist named John O’Sullivan coined another phrase, “manifest destiny,” to describe the role of the American people in human affairs.  The phrase has meant different things over the centuries; at best, it implies a sense of responsibility to other peoples and an obligation to use our nation’s power and influence to ensure their well being.  To most Americans, this meant encouraging the spread of democracy and the God-given rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, as well as the spread of Christianity in order to save souls of more primitive peoples.  Unfortunately, those noble goals could be used to justify almost anything.  It basically meant that Americans believed their values and way of life were superior to all others, and that they had a right to impose these things on other people.  This was how the government defended turning its western guns against the Native Americans, which is great evidence that religion and politics don’t always mix.  

July 20, 2009
LARPers: Those Who Delved Too Deep and Too Greedily

Most people wouldn’t understand what a LARPer (Live Action Role-Player) is, but there are a select few in the fantasy role playing world who know of these elite gamers. Unlike traditional role playing games which partake on a table top or television screen, LARPers take their fantasy role playing one step further, and translate it into real life with fantasy costumes and accessories. Most LARPing takes place in wooded areas outside the boundaries of society, and is not for the faint of heart.

If one were to compare LARPers, roleplaying gamers, and regular people in fantasy roleplaying terms, regular people would be considered human (as they are now). Humans lead short lives, are often regarded as foolish, and are well renowned for their dedication and piety (often to excess). In this scenario, roleplaying gamers would be dwarves, who tolerable in society, but tend to stick together. Dwarves are those who burrow in the earth (often a basement) seeking riches (fat game loots). LARPers are of dwarven blood, but over time, evolved into a subterranean race. These dwarves, also known as “deep dwarves”, delved so deep and so greedily that they became more creature than human. LARPers, in our modern society, would fall into this role.

Great for Movies

Author: MaxMonster
July 7, 2009
Great for Movies

My friend and I are making a parody of spaghetti westerns and we needed some realistic looking props. Despite the fact that we’re shooting in black-and-white, we still need to have realistic looking western guns for the movies climatic ending.

We scoured the internet and found a great website where we were able to purchase beautifully made replica guns and now we can shoot the scene without having to resort to drawn on and modified water guns!

June 23, 2009
Throwing a Lord of the Rings Party: Gandalf Edition

You know who doesn’t love a good theme party? Boring people, that’s who! As a kid, I had all the standard themed birthday parties, all of which involved some sort of movie/book/TV tie-in: A-Team, He-Man, Star Wars, Ninja Turtles, they all were a huge part of my childhood.

For my 25th birthday, I decided to have a Lord of the Rings themed party and encouraged people to come in fantasy costumes worthy of Middle Earth. At first, a few of my easily embarrassed pals grumbled, but the day of the party came and it was a complete success! There were more hobbits there than at a sci-fi convention. I, of course, dressed up like Gandalf because he’s the coolest wizard ever.

Inspired Greek Costumes

Author: MaxMonster
June 4, 2009
Inspired Greek Costumes

The Greeks were one of the most fascinating and most successful cultures in the ancient world, with a rich history that spans several centuries.  The Greeks were also one of the most advanced cultures in the world, and from this cultural advancement, the Greeks were pioneers of literature, art, science, language, and philosophy.  The most common Greek costumes associated include the toga, which is a simple drape of cloth worn around the shoulder to cover much of the chest and the lower extremities.  When people think of Greek warfare, for which the civilization was also famous, often the image of the Spartan hoplite comes to mind.  Wielding a huge shield and long spear with a sword strapped at the waist, the Spartan hoplite was one of the most feared warriors in all the world.  The Spartans mastered combat and built their society around warfare, making them one of the most fascinating cultures to study.

Much of the Greek culture has translated into cultures around the world, and so much of the Greek is rooted in European culture that it’s almost impossible to distinguish one from the other.

Arrrrrrgh! Pirates are Cool!

Author: MaxMonster
May 21, 2009
Arrrrrrgh! Pirates are Cool!

The release of the Pirates of the Caribbean films, in which Johnny Depp played the famed Captain Jack Sparrow, sparked a revolution which pushed pirates back into popular culture.  To this day, the facts and myths associated with life as a pirate fascinate people of all ages.  Pirates lived out their lives on the sea, and were often known to commit acts of fraud, thieving, and drunken debauchery.  But pirates also had a code of conduct, and were a superstitious bunch, traits that pushed their images into popular culture.

Pirate clothing is a favorite amongst people at costume parties, and consists of several different articles.  The common perception of the pirate outfit includes articles like a button up shirt, bandana or pirate hat, and fabric trousers.  Pirates also carried accessories for combat like a cutlass and a pistol, and other accessories including compasses, coin pouches, and small knives for combat or utility purposes.  Perhaps more interesting than pirates are all the myths about giant sea beasts, sirens, and ghost ships from pirate culture.  These myths have helped spawn modern interest in pirates and their lives on the sea.

Viking Swords and Battle Styles

Author: HistoricRogue
May 15, 2009

Viking society was built around the Viking battle axe and the Viking swords, and a man’s social status was dependent upon his skill and bravery in battle (well, that and the amount of loot he brought home from a raid!).  It makes sense, then, that the Vikings had their own dueling rituals, and embraced the duel as a natural part of their justice system.  The Vikings’ concept of a duel would do much to influence ritualized combat in later societies, in that they were one of the first cultures to make it a legitimate course of action for those who felt they’d been wronged, like a law suit today.  The Viking duel, or Holmgang, could be used to settle virtually any dispute, whether over money, honor, or the love of a woman.  The Viking world was strict and unforgiving when it came to matters of war; once challenged, a Viking had to accept, or risk being labeled a coward and stripped of his social standing and self-respect.  He might even be declared an outlaw!  The winner could legally claim everything the loser owned, even his wife and children.  A few skilled warriors even turned the Holmgang into a kind of con game, challenging other warriors who’d done nothing wrong and killing them to botain their property.  Nevertheless, some aspects of the Holmgang display an uncommon sense of fairness.  Unlike later European quarrels, in which only members of the ruling class could have a legitimate duel, any Viking could challenge another regardless of social standing.  That meant that even the poor and downtrodden had the means to stand up for themselves.

May 14, 2009

It’s somewhat unclear whether dueling existed in Ancient Greece and Rome.  The Roman costumes / uniforms definitely weren’t made for it.  Both were military societies whose men were trained for war, and they took their honor and reputations as warriors very seriously.  They probably didn’t hesitate to defend their honor with a sword when they felt they’d been wronged.  Dueling was a more sophisticated concept, though, involving combat between equals armed with the same weapons, and restricted to noblemen, since only they had honor to satisfy.  Dueling as we know it today wouldn’t take shape for several more centuries.  The Greeks and Romans had an equally exciting tradition though, and one with much higher stakes.  It was the practice of single combat, in which a lone warrior could decide the outcome of an entire war.  There have been accounts of single combat since biblical times (David and Goliath, for example), but the Greeks and Roman appear to have been particularly fond of it.  If a warring king or general wished to spare the lives of his men (or just conserve his resources), he could select a champion to fight on his army’s behalf.  The opposing leader was compelled to choose his own fighter, and this one battle would decide the victor. Both armies were honor-bound to respect the outcome of the battle, and be prepared to surrender if their champion lost.  The two men donned their Roman armor and met in the no-man’s-land in the middle of the battlefield while their comrades cheered them on from afar.  Can you imagine the terrible excitement these warriors must have experienced, knowing the fate of their homelands rested on their shoulders? 

May 13, 2009

It’s somewhat unclear whether dueling existed in Ancient Greece and Rome.  Both were military societies whose men were trained for war, and they took their honor and reputations as warriors very seriously.  They probably didn’t hesitate to defend their honor with a sword when they felt they’d been wronged.  Dueling was a more sophisticated concept, though, involving combat between equals armed with the same weapons, and restricted to noblemen, since only they had honor to satisfy.  Dueling as we know it today wouldn’t take shape for several more centuries. 

The Greeks and Romans had an equally exciting tradition though, and one with much higher stakes.  It was the practice of single combat, in which a lone warrior could decide the outcome of an entire war with his Greek sword.  There have been accounts of single combat since biblical times (David and Goliath, for example), but the Greeks and Romans appear to have been particularly fond of it.  If a warring king or general wished to spare the lives of his men (or just conserve his resources), he could select a champion to fight on his army’s behalf.  The opposing leader was compelled to choose his own fighter, and this one battle would decide the victor. Both armies were honor-bound to respect the outcome of the battle, and be prepared to surrender if their champion lost.  The two men donned their Roman armor and met in the no-man’s-land in the middle of the battlefield while their comrades cheered them on from afar.  Can you imagine the terrible excitement these warriors must have experienced, knowing the fate of their homelands rested on their shoulders?